When describing an observation to support objectivity, which phrasing is recommended?

• A. The inmate did not show any aggression.
• B. Time-stamped entries should be omitted.
• C. It seems that the inmate was angry.
• D. When describing an observation, use observable, concrete details; avoid judgments, assumptions, or labels; use 'I observed' and time-stamped entries.

Answer: (D)

Objectivity in reporting comes from sticking to what can be directly observed, with precise timing and clear ownership of the observation. The recommended phrasing trains you to describe observable, concrete details, avoid judgments or labels, and use “I observed” along with time-stamped entries. This approach makes the account verifiable and minimizes misinterpretation, which is crucial in corrections contexts. For example, you might write: “I observed the inmate raising his voice and tapping the desk, at 14:05.” The other options rely on conclusions or interpretations—stating someone is angry, or asserting aggression, or omitting when things happened—none of which provides a solid, checkable record.